• American Bar Association Model Code Of Professional Responsibility, Ethical Consideration 4-1
• American Bar Association Standards for criminal justice
• A PROPOSED NEW APPROACH TO CONFRONTATION
• B. RUSSELL, ON INDUCTION
• BETTER WAYS TO FIND THE GUILTY
• COMMENTARY: PRIVILEGES IN GENERAL
• COMMENTARY: THE USE OF PRIOR CONVICTIONS
• CONDITIONAL RELEVANCE REINTERPRETED
• D. SHAVIRO, STATISTICAL-PROBABILITY EVIDENCE AND THE APPEARANCE OF JUSTICE
• DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BAR COMMITTEE ON LEGAL ETHICS
• E. GREEN, THE COMPLETE COURTHOUSE, IN DISPUTE RESOLUTION DEVICES IN A DEMOCRATIC SOCIETY
• EVIDENCE AND INFERENCE IN THE LAW
• HEARSAY DANGERS AND THE APPLICATION OF THE HEARSAY CONCEPT
• Hume's formulation of the problem of induction
• J. BENTHAM, RATIONALE OF JUDICIAL EVIDENCE
• J. FALKNOR, THE "HEAR-SAY" RULE AS A "SEE-DO" RULE: EVIDENCE OF CONDUCT
• J. THAYER, A PRELIMINARY TREATISE ON EVIDENCE 266 (1898)
• NEUTRAL EXPERTS
• PERILS OF THE RULEMAKING PROCESS
• PERJURY CASE GOES TO DOGS AFTER SHADOW CAST ON WITNESS
• PRESUMING AND PLEADING: AN ESSAY ON JURISTIC IMMATURITY
• Proving Character and Credibility in Sexual Assault Cases
• R. PARK, McCORMICK ON EVIDENCE AND THE CONCEPT OF HEARSAY: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS FOLLOWED BY SUGGESTIONS TO LAW TEACHERS
• RAPE VICTIM SHIELD LAWS AND THE SIXTH AMENDMENT
• RATIONALITY, PRESUMPTIONS, AND JUDICIAL COMMENT: A RESPONSE TO PROFESSOR ALLEN
• REASONABLE DOUBT AND PERMISSIVE INFERENCES: THE VALUE OF COMPLEXITY
• Reference Guide On Forensic Dna Evidence
• RELEVANCY, PROBABILITY AND THE LAW
• SCIENTIFIC EXPERT TESTIMONY AND INTELLECTUAL DUE PROCESS, 107 Yale Law Journal, 1535, 1673-1679 (1998)
• SHOULD THE RULES OF EVIDENCE BE MODIFIED FOR CIVIL NON-JURY TRIALS
• Structuring jury decision making in criminal cases
• THE BASES OF EXPERT OPINIONS
• THE CONVERGENCE OF FACT AND OPINION
• THE DEATH PENALTY AND HORRIFYING MISTAKES
• THE EVIDENCE OR THE EVENT? ON JUDICIAL PROOF AND THE ACCEPTABILITY OF VERDICTS
• THE GERMAN ADVANTAGE IN CIVIL PROCEDURE
• THE PROBABLE AND THE PROVABLE
• THE PROCEDURE OF ADMITTING EVIDENCE UNDER RULE 801(d)(2)(E): CO-CONSPIRATORS' STATEMENTS
• THE THEORETICAL FOUNDATION OF THE HEARSAY RULES
• THE TREASON TRIAL OF SIR WALTER RALEIGH
• Trial Lawyers' Ethics
• TRIANGULATING HEARSAY
• WHEN CONDUCT PRESENTS HEARSAY PROBLEMS